Press TV has interviewed Alan Sabrosky, a managing editor at the Veterans Today from Jackson, Mississippi, and The Hill columnist Brent Budowsky from Washington, to discuss the September 11 attacks in the United States, which happened 14 years ago.
Sabrosky rules out the evidence that the US administration announced as a proof for the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington, saying that no airplane parts were found near the Pentagon, adding other stories that have been narrated about two other airplanes, which hit the Twin Towers, are unbelievable.
He argues the only regime that benefits from the September 11 attacks is Israel, adding that the regime had some kind of strategic interests in orchestrating such attacks, because Tel Aviv has always benefited from chaos and insecurity.
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which should have been called the project for the new Israeli century because of its links with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is a group in the United States that enjoys many interests in orchestrating the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Those, who were behind the 9/11 attacks, pursued two objectives: “One is to stimulate an enormous anti-Islam sentiment within the US, which has been done very successfully; and the second is to get the United States militarily involved in wars in the Middle East,” Sabrosky concludes.
Budowsky, for his part, says he himself heard a big crash when a plane hit the Pentagon, but he could not see any aircraft in this case. He thinks, the US authorities have said the truth about the September 11 events.
However, the columnist maintains he is open to every investigation into the trustworthiness of the factual findings concerning the 9/11 attacks.
There are routine technical and human errors, when it comes to the control of flights over the US air space, Budowsky states, adding that the issue that The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) could not intercept three airplanes of the 9/11 attacks is not strange.