Trump floats ‘Dream Military’ fueled by record $1.5-trillion budget

US President Donald Trump has announced plans to request a record-breaking $1.5-trillion military budget for fiscal year 2027, marking a roughly 50-percent increase from the current Department of War budget of about $1 trillion.

In a brief post on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday, Trump said the funding would be used to build what he described as his “Dream Military,” offering few further details.

If approved by Congress, the proposal would represent the largest military budget in US history.

The proposed increase of nearly $500 billion reflects the scale and cost of Trump’s stated military ambitions, including the so-called “Golden Dome” missile system and his call for developing a new class of battleships. Under existing funding levels, neither program could be fully financed.

The announcement came as Congress has yet to finalize a military spending bill for the current fiscal year, although lawmakers are expected to approve several billion dollars more than the administration initially requested.

The department’s budget reached the $1-trillion mark this year largely due to a $150-billion increase added by Congress through a reconciliation bill, with much of that funding allocated over five years for long-term projects.

Some Republicans have long argued that US military spending should rise significantly as a share of the national economy, with calls to push it towards five percent of gross domestic product, compared with the current level of about 3.5 percent.

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, welcomed Trump’s proposal, saying sustained increases were needed to rebuild the Navy, Air Force, nuclear forces, and to support military personnel.

Trump’s budget declaration followed hours after he criticized major US contractors in another social media post, blasting them for slow production and excessive costs.

Despite Republican enthusiasm for higher military spending, securing an additional half-trillion dollars annually could prove difficult.

GOP leaders have left open the possibility of using another party-line reconciliation bill to boost military funding, though the approach is procedurally complex and politically contentious.

Democrats are expected to oppose any deal that pairs higher military spending with cuts to areas such as foreign aid, which robustly supports Washington’s aggressive allies, foremost among which the Israeli regime, with billions of dollars on an annual basis.

House Appropriations Committee Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said military spending “needs to go up,” but stopped short of endorsing the scale of Trump’s proposal. Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.) was more explicit, praising Trump’s call and critiquing, what he called, years of underfunding.

Trump’s push for an unprecedented military budget is consistent with his long-standing emphasis on firepower as a central instrument of US policy.

During his political career, he has repeatedly framed American strength in terms of military might, insisting that force deters adversaries. His rhetoric has often emphasized rebuilding and expanding the armed forces, increasing weapons procurement, and investing in large-scale projects.

The president’s language and approach have also revived references to the United States’ earlier conception of its military establishment.

Before 1947, the Pentagon was formally known as the War Department, a title replaced by “the Department of Defense” under the National Security Act in an effort to portray a defensive posture after World War II. Trump, however, reversed the designation.

Critics and analysts have noted that Trump’s simultaneous emphasis on military expansion, coupled with his frequent use of confrontational language, echoes an era when US military policy was more openly framed around preparation for war rather than deterrence alone.

Whether in his current capacity or during his former tenure, Trump has matched the language with wholesale aggression targeting numerous spots worldwide, including Syria, Iran, Yemen, and Venezuela.

Whether Congress ultimately approves Trump’s $1.5 trillion request remains uncertain, but the proposal has already intensified debate in Washington over the scale, purpose, and long-term consequences of US military spending.

Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:

www.presstv.co.uk