News   /   Society

Trump asks Supreme Court to block judge's travel ban ruling

US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo)
US President Donald Trump holds a press conference with the French president following meetings at the Elysee Palace in Paris, on July 13, 2017, (Photo by AFP)

The Donald Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to block a federal judge's ruling that grandparents of American citizens already being processed by resettlement agencies are exempt from the US president's controversial travel ban.

The Justice Department asked the justices in a court filing on Friday to overturn the ruling of a US district judge in Hawaii that sought to limit the scope of the administration's ban on people from six Muslim countries.

US District Judge Derrick Watson ruled on Thursday that the federal government’s list of family relatives eligible to bypass the travel ban should be expanded to include grandparents, grandchildren, uncles, aunts and other relatives, as well as refugees without family ties to the country.

In his decision, Watson harshly criticized the government’s actions, calling them "the antithesis of common sense."

This AFP file photo taken on March 31, 2012 shows the US Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.

The Supreme Court handed a surprising victory to the president attempting to ban Muslims last month when it granted the government's request to reinstate parts of the contentious ban.

The court announced that it would hear arguments on the legality of Trump’s executive order in the court's next term, which starts in October.

However, the court also said that people with a "bona fide relationship" to a US person or entity could not be barred.

The Trump administration had narrowly interpreted that language, saying the ban would apply to grandparents and other family members, which prompted Judge Watson to expand the definition of who could be admitted.

The Justice Department argued on Friday that the judge's ruling "empties the (Supreme) Court’s decision of meaning, as it encompasses not just ‘close’ family members but virtually all family members.”

Read More:

People protest outside as the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle prepares to hear arguments on US President Donald Trump's executive order banning citizens from six Muslim countries from entering the US, May 15, 2017. (Photo by AFP)

Omar Jadwat, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union involved in challenging the ban, said, "The truth here is that the government’s interpretation of the Supreme Court’s stay order defies common sense.”

"That’s what the district court correctly found and the attorney general’s misleading attacks on its decision can’t change that fact."

Trump issued a revised travel ban on March 6 after his initial directive signed in January was blocked by a federal judge in Seattle, Washington, and upheld by the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco, California.

However, the revised order was also blocked by federal judges in the states of Hawaii and Maryland and upheld by the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia.

The ban puts a three-month pause on travel to the United States by nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and a four-month halt on all refugee resettlement.

Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:

Press TV News Roku