A U.S.
newspaper reports that the recent attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya that
killed the U.S. ambassador was a catastrophic intelligence loss for the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA).
The New York
Times called the attack “a major setback” for the CIA because its agents and
contractors were among the Americans evacuated afterward.
After the
destruction of the U.S. Consulate, the CIA forced to withdraw about a dozen
spies who were staying there.
“It’s a
catastrophic intelligence loss,” said one American official who has served in
Libya and who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the FBI is still
investigating the attack. “We got our eyes poked out.”
Senior American
officials acknowledged the intelligence setback, but insisted that information
was still being collected using a variety of informants on the ground, systems
that intercept electronic communications like cellphone conversations and
satellite imagery. NY Times Within months of
the start of Libyan revolution in February 2011, the CIA began building a
meaningful but covert presence in Benghazi. NY Times Though the
agency has been cooperating with the new post-Qaddafi Libyan intelligence
service, the size of the CIA’s presence in Benghazi apparently surprised some
Libyan leaders. The deputy prime minister, Mustafa Abushagour, was quoted in The
Wall Street Journal last week saying that he learned about some of the delicate
American operations in Benghazi only after the attack on the mission, in large
part because a surprisingly large number of Americans showed up at the Benghazi
airport to be evacuated. NY Times The attack has
raised questions about the adequacy of security preparations at the two American
compounds in Benghazi: the American mission, the main diplomatic facility where
Ambassador Christopher Stevens and another American diplomat died of smoke
inhalation after an initial attack, and an annex a half-mile away that
encompassed four buildings inside a low-walled compound. NY Times The State
Department chose to maintain only limited security in Benghazi, Libya, despite
months of sporadic attacks there on U.S. and other Western missions. And while
the U.S. said it would ask Libya to boost security there, it did so just once,
for a one-week period in June, according to Libyan officials. WSJ President Barack
Obama's administration initially said it believed extremists had not really
planned the attack in Libya but simply taken advantage of a spontaneous protest
over an anti-Islamic trailer to mix in and attack. AFP The White House
for the first time Thursday described the assault as a "terrorist attack" and
said it could have links to al-Qaeda. AFP But a Republican
lawmaker, Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, cast doubt
Sunday over whether the protests even happened. AFP Secretary of
State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced last week the creation of a review board
to examine the attacks. NY Times The attacks cost
the State Department its ambassador, it cost the Obama campaign the claim of
Libya as a big “win” and it cost the Libyan government the pretense of security.
Antiwar.com
AGB/HJ