The
Pentagon says it has spent $550 million on U.S. military operations in Libya,
mostly for bombs and missiles.
Details
of expenditures on the Libya mission show the Defense Department spending more
than 60 percent of the $550 million on bombs and missiles, and the rest on
getting troops and funding the costs of combat.
The
total, the first official tab to be released by the Pentagon, reflects
expenditures above and beyond those of day-to-day military operations like troop
salaries and the upkeep of ships, Pentagon spokeswoman Navy Cmdr. Kathleen
Kesler told the AP. Politico
Of the
$550 million in added spending through Monday, about 60 percent was "for
munitions, the remaining costs are for higher operating tempo" of U.S. forces
and of getting them there, Kesler said on Tuesday. AP The
spending only addresses the U.S. part of the costs in Libya, where an
international coalition has been operating and NATO is now taking over command.
AP "Future
costs are highly uncertain," Kesler said. But officials estimate that they'll
see added costs of about $40 million over the next three weeks as U.S. forces
are reduced and NATO assumes more responsibility for the operation started March
19, she said. AP After
that, officials expect to spend about $40 million a month, "if U.S. forces stay
at the levels currently planned and the operation continues," Kesler said.
AP U.S.
President Barack Obama on Monday told Americans his actions had stopped a
"massacre" in Libya, but warned a military campaign to oust Muammar Gaddafi
could repeat the bloodshed and misery of Iraq. Raw Story Obama
mounted a firm defense of his decision to launch air strikes and launch a no-fly
zone as part of an international coalition to protect civilians after the
teetering Arab strongman threatened his own people with a bloodbath. Raw
Story
The
Obama Administration took the United States to war against Libya without
bothering to notify Congress, much less obtain a constitutionally-mandated
declaration of war. The Hill As a
candidate in 2007, then-Sen. Obama said a president could not unilaterally
authorize military action without Congress' consent. That's just what he's now
doing in Libya. slate.com The
United States and its allies have run into some criticism for the intensity of
the firepower unleashed on Libya. rferl.org House of
Representatives Speaker John Boehner on Wednesday (March 23) sharpened his
criticism of President Barack Obama's handling of military operations in Libya,
pressing Obama over the mission's cost, leadership and exit strategy.
Reuters Newt
Gingrich, former U.S. House speaker and potential presidential candidate accused
Obama of going to war without having a real consultation with Congress.
Mcclatchydc.com Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates warned Congress earlier in March
that even a more modest effort to establish a no-flight zone over Libya would
have to begin with an attack on the country's air defenses and would require "a
big operation in a big country." NY Times "This is
not a question of whether we or our allies can do this. We can do it," Gates
told reporters aboard his plane after a visit to Bahrain. "The question is
whether it's a wise thing to do and that's the discussion that's going on at a
political level," he said. Times of India
HJ/SM/MMN