The US government wants us to believe its tales about the deaths of Boston bombing witness Ibragim Todashev and terror boogieman Osama Bin Laden. So why is it hiding key information about both cases?
Yesterday the Boston Globe
reported, “A Florida medical examiner’s office said Tuesday that the FBI has ordered the office not to release its autopsy report of a Chechen man fatally shot by a Boston FBI agent in May...”
Why would the FBI cover up the Todashev autopsy report? Because it showed that FBI agents murdered Todashev in cold blood, execution style.
Todashev's father has obtained sixteen detailed photographs of his son's body. They show six gunshot wounds to the torso - and an execution-style blowout to the back of the head.
Why would FBI agents stage the execution-style murder of an important witness in the Boston bombing case? If they were trying to solve the bombing, they would obviously do everything humanly possible to keep all witnesses alive. When the FBI starts killing witnesses - or helping other agencies and criminal organizations kill witnesses, as in the JFK cover-up - it means they are trying to cover up the crime, not solve it.
What is the FBI covering up? The truth. The Boston bombing was obviously a poorly-executed false-flag operation.
Prior to the bombing, the authorities repeatedly announced that a terror drill was taking place. They told participants not to worry, it was only a drill.
Rooftop “spotters” were running the bombing. Witnesses report that suspicious figures, apparent paramilitary professionals, were overseeing the bombing from neighboring rooftops. These “spotters” were captured in photographs, as reported by Science Times
in the article “Mystery Man On Roof Sparks Boston Marathon Explosion Conspiracies
The spotters were giving orders to the Craft International operatives who planted the bombs, as proved beyond a reasonable doubt by photographic evidence.
The FBI apparently wanted Ibragim Todashev to sign a false witness statement implicating the Tsarnaev patsies. Todashev refused, presumably because he (like everyone else who knew the brothers) was convinced of their innocence. So the FBI murdered Todashev, execution-style, as a message to others involved in the case: “Cooperate with our frame-up of the Tsarnaevs, or else...”
The FBI's lies about the Todashev killing are similar to US government lies about the alleged killing of Osama Bin Laden. In both cases, it seems that critically-important witnesses were murdered rather than kept alive - which makes absolutely no sense.
If the US government was really trying to solve the crimes of 9/11, and if it really believed that Osama Bin Laden was a terrorist mastermind, it would have done everything possible, including sacrificing the lives of as many soldiers as necessary, to take Bin Laden alive.
If he was really an al-Qaeda mastermind, Bin Laden would have possessed critically important information about his terrorist network. If government conspiracy theories are true, Bin Laden's organization might even have obtained WMD and targeted American cities. By killing Bin Laden rather than taking him alive and interrogating him, the US might have condemned hundreds of thousands or even millions of Americans to death by al-Qaeda WMD attack. And even if this were only a 1% possibility, as Dick Cheney tells us, the government would have to treat it as if it were definitely going to happen.
So when the US government tells us it made no real effort to capture Bin Laden alive, but instead just staged an execution-style killing of the most important terror witness in history, it is obviously lying.
The story of the alleged Bin Laden killing is full of contradictions and absurdities. First we were told that Obama and his cabinet watched the killing as it happened; we were even shown photos of Hillary Clinton shrieking in pleasure at the sight. Then we were told that this never happened.
We were shown a fake photo purporting to show Bin Laden's corpse. It turned out to be a bad photoshop hoax.
In fact, there are no photos of Bin Laden's body. There was no autopsy. There was no positive identification that it was Bin Laden, no transparent, public DNA evidence with a chain of custody, no witnesses...no evidence at all, in fact. And nobody saw the body being thrown into the ocean, “in accordance with Islamic burial custom” !
The Associated Press and the London Daily Mail
recently published an article headlined:
“Pentagon DELETES files about Osama bin Laden raid after transferring them to CIA where they can't be made public
- Military files about the Navy SEAL raid on Osama bin Laden's hideout have been purged from Pentagon computers
- Associated Press requested information on the raid some 20 times in 2011 but requests were rejected
- A line in an inspector general's draft report states the files were purged from the defense department to another government department to prevent certain information about the raid being made public
- The sentence was removed from the final report released weeks ago”
If the government account is true, the secrecy makes no sense. If they really killed Bin Laden, every scrap of information about the raid - every second of video, every photograph, every memo, every DNA test, every autopsy file, every debriefing - would be proudly waved before the world.
If the government account were true, there would be no need to “prevent certain information about the raid being made public.”
So what are they covering up? Did they kill a Bin Laden double rather than Bin Laden himself, who (according to numerous reports) died in December, 2001? Or was the whole raid just a drill - a theatrical staged event like the Boston bombings...and like 9/11 itself?